NHL
Yesterday: 1-0 +1.05
Second straight day of one game, one winner. Busy night tonight will change things.
YTD: 12-12-1 -0.98 units (@ 1 unit each)
R.O.I.: -3.5%
Average win: 1.12 units
Average loss: 1.20 units
Breakeven price: -107
Breakeven winning %: 51.8%
Current YTD winning %: 50.0%
Handicapping the handicapping
Goals scored per game: 3.1
Goals allowed per game: 2.9
Shots on goal per game: 32.5
Shots allowed per game: 25.7
Shooting percentage for: 9.5%
Shooting percentage against: 11.4%
Overtime results: 3-5 -3.33 (0-2 ot/3-3 so)
Losses where my team outshot opponent: 10
Wins where my team got outshot by opponent: 3
Comments: The shots on goal results combined with shooting percentage are a good indicator of the health of a team and how well they are playing. While shots don't directly translate to wins, I'd rather have more than the opponent for obvious reasons. My SOG advantage of +6.8 per game is very good but I've been hurt by giving up an 11.4% shooting percentage (-1.9% worse than my SP); which means my goalies only have an .886 save percentage which has diminished my shot advantage. If my OT games were 50/50 and even on the money line, I would still have +2.35 units of profit despite getting outshot by almost a full 2%. So far, I've had 25 wagers involving 26 teams (1 two-team parlay). 21 of those 26 teams outshot their opponent (81%), which is all I can ask for.
Tonight's matchups. Eight different formula ratings (+/-) factoring strength of schedule and an overall number in blue at the end. This is for informational purposes and not my sole means of capping:
Tonight's plays:
Detroit -132
Ottawa has almost been playing as bad as Detroit but the Wings finally showed a little life in the last game, scoring 17 seconds in and snapping their 7-game losing streak. Ottawa has lost three straight by a combined 12-6.
NY Rangers -110
They have the edge in all eight of my statistical matchups above and a significant edge in three of them although Nashville has started playing well recently. Rangers have played seven straight one-goal games (not including empty netters).
Los Angeles -160
This one is all over the radar with four strong stat indicators listed above (pos vs neg and by a wide enough amount) and four other statistical indicators from another part of my capping. The situationals look good as well.
These are the only three I'm playing because I want to be cautious now that I have added some reinforcements recently, but these were close and I want to keep a close eye on these: Philadelphia, St. Louis, Vancouver, New Jersey
Yesterday: 1-0 +1.05
Second straight day of one game, one winner. Busy night tonight will change things.
YTD: 12-12-1 -0.98 units (@ 1 unit each)
R.O.I.: -3.5%
Average win: 1.12 units
Average loss: 1.20 units
Breakeven price: -107
Breakeven winning %: 51.8%
Current YTD winning %: 50.0%
Handicapping the handicapping
Goals scored per game: 3.1
Goals allowed per game: 2.9
Shots on goal per game: 32.5
Shots allowed per game: 25.7
Shooting percentage for: 9.5%
Shooting percentage against: 11.4%
Overtime results: 3-5 -3.33 (0-2 ot/3-3 so)
Losses where my team outshot opponent: 10
Wins where my team got outshot by opponent: 3
Comments: The shots on goal results combined with shooting percentage are a good indicator of the health of a team and how well they are playing. While shots don't directly translate to wins, I'd rather have more than the opponent for obvious reasons. My SOG advantage of +6.8 per game is very good but I've been hurt by giving up an 11.4% shooting percentage (-1.9% worse than my SP); which means my goalies only have an .886 save percentage which has diminished my shot advantage. If my OT games were 50/50 and even on the money line, I would still have +2.35 units of profit despite getting outshot by almost a full 2%. So far, I've had 25 wagers involving 26 teams (1 two-team parlay). 21 of those 26 teams outshot their opponent (81%), which is all I can ask for.
Tonight's matchups. Eight different formula ratings (+/-) factoring strength of schedule and an overall number in blue at the end. This is for informational purposes and not my sole means of capping:
Carolina | 0.7 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.7 | -2.3 |
Boston | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.9 |
Minnesota | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 4.5 |
Winnipeg | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.9 |
Ottawa | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | -11.0 |
Detroit | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | -3.2 |
NY Islanders | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 | -11.7 |
Philadelphia | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
Washington | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 5.5 | 3.7 | 1.8 | -3.7 |
Toronto | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 11.9 | 8.4 | 2.2 | 2.6 | -6.6 |
Pittsburgh | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 7.2 |
Montreal | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 12.0 |
Anaheim | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 4.4 |
Phoenix | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 0.1 | -6.1 |
NY Rangers | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 10.1 |
Nashville | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.6 | -7.1 |
Dallas | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
St. Louis | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 5.3 | 4.8 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 5.5 |
Chicago | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 1.9 | -4.2 |
Vancouver | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 6.7 | 4.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 7.7 |
Colorado | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | -4.7 |
Los Angeles | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 12.9 |
New Jersey | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 5.2 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 16.3 |
San Jose | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 4.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Tonight's plays:
Detroit -132
Ottawa has almost been playing as bad as Detroit but the Wings finally showed a little life in the last game, scoring 17 seconds in and snapping their 7-game losing streak. Ottawa has lost three straight by a combined 12-6.
NY Rangers -110
They have the edge in all eight of my statistical matchups above and a significant edge in three of them although Nashville has started playing well recently. Rangers have played seven straight one-goal games (not including empty netters).
Los Angeles -160
This one is all over the radar with four strong stat indicators listed above (pos vs neg and by a wide enough amount) and four other statistical indicators from another part of my capping. The situationals look good as well.
These are the only three I'm playing because I want to be cautious now that I have added some reinforcements recently, but these were close and I want to keep a close eye on these: Philadelphia, St. Louis, Vancouver, New Jersey
No comments:
Post a Comment