MLB TARP Analysis - 2014 (TARP = Team Adjusted Run Production)
For some reason, probably due to fussing with the formatting of the table, I forgot to post the actual plays yesterday which did well but I won't count them in the displayed record out of fairness.
Yesterday: 4-2 +2.27 (not posted, not counted)
YTD: -0.22 units (@ 1 unit each)
Today's matchups showing offensive and defensive TARP adjustments, expected runs to be scored, the "real" line based on the data, and the actual line:
Today's selections
Miami +126
Strictly a value play based on my other statistical formulas.
Baltimore +107
Value play. See Miami.
Boston +154
Third value play. Three dogs. One wins, I don't get hurt too bad. Two win, I make a nice profit on the set. These all have strong, qualifying statistical value on the offensive side.
Kansas City -120
This is the strongest of the three. Royals got a little lucky to win last night after pounding the D-backs 12-2 the night before. KC 11-3 run, ARI 1-4 L5. Qualifying plays in Game 3 after winning the first two are 21-10 +12.94 units this season.
For some reason, probably due to fussing with the formatting of the table, I forgot to post the actual plays yesterday which did well but I won't count them in the displayed record out of fairness.
Yesterday: 4-2 +2.27 (not posted, not counted)
YTD: -0.22 units (@ 1 unit each)
Today's matchups showing offensive and defensive TARP adjustments, expected runs to be scored, the "real" line based on the data, and the actual line:
OFF | DEF | RUNS | rLINE | aLINE | |||
NY Mets | -0.9 | -2.0 | 3.0 | -136 | 150 | ||
Washington | 0.1 | -0.3 | 2.3 | 126 | -160 | ||
San Francisco | 0.1 | -0.1 | 4.1 | 117 | 120 | ||
Milwaukee | 0.9 | -0.2 | 5.0 | -127 | -130 | ||
Chi Cubs | 0.6 | -2.7 | 5.8 | -255 | 111 | ||
Colorado | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 245 | -121 | ||
Detroit | -0.4 | -0.9 | 2.2 | 154 | 105 | ||
NY Yankees | 0.3 | -1.6 | 3.5 | -164 | -115 | ||
Miami | -0.5 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 134 | 126 | ||
Pittsburgh | 0.5 | -0.3 | 4.7 | -144 | -136 | ||
Baltimore | 0.0 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 176 | 107 | ||
Toronto | 1.1 | -0.7 | 6.2 | -186 | -117 | ||
Minnesota | 1.5 | -0.3 | 3.9 | -114 | 245 | ||
Oakland | -0.3 | -1.7 | 3.6 | 104 | -265 | ||
Chi WhSox | 1.2 | 0.5 | 5.1 | -120 | 172 | ||
Seattle | -0.3 | -0.3 | 4.4 | 110 | -182 | ||
Houston | -0.5 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 131 | -109 | ||
Philadelphia | 0.0 | -0.6 | 4.2 | -141 | -101 | ||
Cleveland | 0.9 | 0.0 | 3.9 | -114 | 107 | ||
Cincinnati | -0.6 | -1.2 | 3.6 | 104 | -117 | ||
Boston | -0.1 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 185 | 154 | ||
St. Louis | 0.1 | -1.2 | 5.5 | -195 | -164 | ||
Kansas City | 0.3 | 0.3 | 4.7 | -108 | -120 | ||
Arizona | 0.1 | 0.2 | 4.5 | -102 | 110 | ||
LA Dodgers | 0.1 | -1.0 | 6.3 | -197 | -102 | ||
LA Angels | 0.1 | 2.0 | 3.3 | 187 | -108 |
Today's selections
Miami +126
Strictly a value play based on my other statistical formulas.
Baltimore +107
Value play. See Miami.
Boston +154
Third value play. Three dogs. One wins, I don't get hurt too bad. Two win, I make a nice profit on the set. These all have strong, qualifying statistical value on the offensive side.
Kansas City -120
This is the strongest of the three. Royals got a little lucky to win last night after pounding the D-backs 12-2 the night before. KC 11-3 run, ARI 1-4 L5. Qualifying plays in Game 3 after winning the first two are 21-10 +12.94 units this season.
No comments:
Post a Comment